Jericho and Gobekli Tepe Not as Old as They Say

After looking at the timelines of these ancient settlements supposedly from around 10,000BC, I have to say that it seems scientists and archaeologists will go to great lengths to pre-date what the Bible says even if they are easily proven wrong by the Bible itself as well as a little critical thinking. For example, these timelines have all kinds of archaeological "evidence" suggesting man existed prior to 4000BC. I'm not a young earther (nor do I believe in evolution) but when Christians are going with every "expert" opinion on these discoveries, suggesting creation had to have been about 15,000BC, Adam was 13652BC and the flood was 6/7000BC they are saying that the Bible's explicit timing is wrong and merely allegorical in its historical account.

Offering evidence that the walls of Jericho were built around 7000BC, the earliest food production was about 9000BC, and that the Egyptian dynastic period started around 5000BC, I'm not sorry to say that I am highly skeptical. I have little faith in archaeological dating from that far back, especially when I know that there have been repeated attempts to forge the fossil record with fake specimens.  Scientists and archaeologists are all-to-often compelled to force assertions that are in line with their own career objectives, biases and their desire to secure funding.

The first civilization was Sumer, where Abram came out of, which started around 3500BC or so. All these other attempts to show the evolution of civilization before this time (like Göbekli Tepe) are at best inaccurate and at worst a satanic conspiracy (consider how much money the elite ruling class have at their disposal). If they can fake the moon landings what else can they accomplish together?

If you take the Bible seriously these things were built after 4000BC and some of them had to have been after the flood. Radio carbon dating seems to be in line with the common theory but I have a lot of skepticism regarding the accuracy of RC dating since it's not very scientific and requires a lot of speculative assumptions in the method itself. Besides, who are the people funding the dating? Might they have an agenda? Also, does it seem more likely that Jericho and Gobekli Tepe were established in neolithic times, buried and abandoned for centuries, re-established, buried and abandoned again for centuries and re-re-established again in the bronze age OR is it much more plausible that the inhabitants came later, stayed there, covered the old site and successively rebuilt on top of it?

Creation was around 4000BC (actually, it's a re-creation/restoration but I can't explain all that on here - just look up the Gap Theory and my views are very similar http://www.heart4god.ws/foundations-of-faith.htm). This is easily discerned from diligently studying what the Bible teaches. If we actually used the resources we have at our disposal in this age of information and used our God-given discernment to seek the truth we would know this and not build timelines that are blatantly antithetical to the truth behind the narrative in the Bible. Further, articles like this are a great example of people just making stuff up: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/07/150722144709.htm

If with every new discovery every other month we have to keep rethinking what our "ancestors" were capable of further and further back in time, there might be something fishy going on. Dagon-style fishy.

Years ago I was driving to work on a crowded highway. There was a toll stop about 1-2 miles ahead. Most people were going slow but there were gaps in the traffic so I changed lanes often to the next fastest lane (This was admittedly before I developed more patience). The traffic was going no faster than 45 MPH. I only had an opportunity to speed up about 10 MPH to change lanes because of the congestion. The speed limit was 50. The next thing I know I have a motorcycle cop waving me to pull over. He proceeded to yell at me all red-faced about wreckless driving (it wasn't all that wreckless) and then gave me a ticket for going 28 MPH over the speed limit. My question is, since it was physically impossible for me to have been going 78 MPH in that congestion how is it he was able to produce a radar reading of "me" going 78 MPH?

If teams of archaeologists and scientists have forged numerous fossils to make them appear to be missing links (prime example: Piltdown Man, Nebraska Man, Archaeoraptor and isolated, questionable partial specimens like Lucy where a baboon bone was accidentally included) and these forgeries/misappropriated specimens are allowed to be in the fossil record for decades, influencing modern science until they are proven as fakes or accidents then what else are these people capable of? Surely the artist recreations of these partial skeletons are reliable because... well, scientists and mass media moguls told them what to draw and sculpt. You know, I think they put obvious fakes out there like this to legitimize the "real" fossil record, like they are performing their due diligence to keep the record pure. Who really knows for sure what they are showing us is real? Doesn't it require an act of FAITH?

If companies like Monsanto, DuPont and Bayer can concoct skewed studies that prove their chemicals are safe so they can make billions when they are later proven to be human carcinogens then what else are "they" capable of?

If climate change science is spurious and inaccurate in its assumptions due to skewing of data in favor of specific results then...

If it is provable beyond a doubt that we have never been to the moon (by a mountain of solid evidence including confessions from NASA that they a) can't get back to the moon today because they b) can't reproduce the technology they had in the 60's and c) all the data/footage from the moon landing missions has accidentally been erased, AND d) they can't figure out how to get men in tin boxes passed the Van Allen Radiation Belts), then what else are the Luciferian elite ruling classes with their teams of scientists capable of?

Mainstream science is more often driven by confirmation bias, logical fallacies and a desire to show off than a desire for the truth. The fact is that the truth doesn't come by logic or reason. It comes by faith in the One who is Truth. True science comes from Him revealing deeper understanding of His nature to us AT HIS WILL, not ours. We should be responsible enough with what He gives us to not jump conclusions and rebel against our Father in vain attempts to make huge leaps in human progress. Yet, as moral relativists say, "Should is a dirty word."